Home
AC103-6
AC103-7
Accident Reporting
AIM
AeroMedical
Airport Security
Airport Markings
Annual Inspection
ASTM
Board Members
Contact NAPPF
Density Altitude
Endorsements
Flight Parks
Flight
Instruction
Flight
Instruments
Flight Plan
Formation Flying
Hints
History
Home
Insurance
Knowledge Test
LINKS
Light
Sport Aircraft Process
NAPPF UPDATE
Navigation
News
NOTAM
NPRM
Pilot
Privileges & Limitations
Pilot/Instructor Requirements
Part 103
Part 103 Preamble
Radio
Resources
Sectional Charts
Sport
Pilot Topics
TFR
Training
Training Materials
UltraFlight
Magazine
UltraFlight Radio
Visibility & Cloud
Clearance
Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI)
Weather
Weather Services
Home
| |
NAPPF NEWS
11/14/03
Membership
What will the ultralight organizations
do in the future? The most immediate answer to the question is to help their
members make the move to Sport Pilot or help their members become compliant with
Part 103. That is exactly the goal of NAPPF during the transition period.
As the new rule is published, there will be many questions. What if? How does
this affect me? What do I do next? NAPPF will help answer all of our member’s
questions as we inform and educate. Our objective is to get the information to
our members quickly and accurately. NAPPF may work internally or with other
ultralight organizations, but the objective is the same – answers & education.
The transition period will have a very specific duration during which pilots
will decide whether it’s Part 103 or Sport Pilot.
After the transition period the goals of NAPPF will remain the same. NAPPF will
continue its mission of education and representation. Education through
seminars, publications, the website (nappf.com)
and personal interaction. Representation in groups setting standards for the
Sport Pilot industry. Our objectives go beyond Sport Pilot. Our goals include
both Private Pilot & Commercial Pilot ratings for powered parachutes. There are
privileges that go with these higher ratings that our members are already asking
for.
Now back to the present. NAPPF has been on a membership dues moratorium for the
past year. Members of record as of fall ‘02, continued to be members, without
any additional dues. This allowed membership dues paid to our old partner to run
their course without affecting NAPPF members. As a result, all members who paid
dues to the old organization continued to be a member of NAPPF.
In November the moratorium ended, by vote of the NAPPF Board, and annual dues
were reinstated. Annual dues were set at $35.
There are benefits with NAPPF membership. In addition to education &
representation, another important benefit is UltraFlight Magazine. Included in
NAPPF annual dues is a 12 month subscription to UltraFlight Magazine. Already a
subscriber to UltraFlight Magazine? Your current subscription will be continued
an additional 12 months with payment of your NAPPF annual membership dues.
Dues can be paid using PayPal on the website (nappf.com)
or by sending a check for $35 to:
NAPPF
Box 399
Billings MT 59103
Other programs such as insurance are being worked on. As they become available,
you will see them first on the website
nappf.com.
The future of NAPPF is Education & Representation on behalf of the Powered
Parachute community.
11/13/03
NAPPF on the Radio
During the past flying season, NAPPF
has been on the radio weekly. Safety, flying & ground school topics have been
aired on UltraFlight Radio,
ultraflightradio.com. If you missed the live broadcast, each segment is
available on the archive. Go to the “archives
by name” page, and click on “Jim
Sweeney, NAPPF”.
Topics include
Using the Aviation Band Radio
Reading Sectionals
Leaving the Pattern
What is "Pilot in Command”?
Ultralight Patterns at Airports
Airport Etiquette
Log Book Entries/Endorsements
News about Sport Pilot from Oshkosh
Special Use Airspace
Maintaining your BFI/UFI
Micrometeorology
Learning what it takes to become a BFI or UFI
Aviation Band Radios
Density altitude
Congested Area
Ultralights & Making Money
11/6/03
Color Country Fly In Hurricane, UT
The NAPPF Board of Directors voted to sponsor the Color Country Fly In with a
$500 donation to help cover operating expenses.
NAPPF presented Safety Seminars in the NAPPF Briefing Tent (Tent courtesy of
Powrachute) at the Color Country Fly In. Presenters included Betty Pfeiffer,
Boll Gargano, Hank Austin, Clyde Poser and Jim Sweeney.
8/14/03
World Powered Parachute Championships Greenville, IL
NAPPF presented Safety Seminars in the NAPPF Briefing Tent (Tent courtesy of
APPCA) at the World Powered Parachute Championships. Presenters included
Frederick Scheffel, Scott Hughes, Tom Olenik, Ron Wagner and Jim Sweeney.
7/31/03
EAA AirVenture Oshkosh
NAPPF presented a seminar on Airspace as part of the EAA Ultralight Seminar
Series. Approximately 25 people attended. The presenter was Jim Sweeney.
5/8/03
ASTM Meeting Kansas City
NAPPF participated in the ASTM meeting held in Kansas City, MO. Meeting topics
focused on finishing up the 5 Powered Parachute documents. Additional
committees were formed for Engines and a common Pilot Operating Handbook.
Conference calls continue to be the main work area with the finish work
completed at the main meeting.
The NAPPF representative was Jim Sweeney
4/03
From NAPPF UPDATE
Update
Welcome to
the new home of the NAPPF Update. Our thanks go to Jim & Irene Byers for
providing the space in UltraFlight Magazine for our membership update.
A lot has transpired in the past months, a number of items are in process
and the NAPPF has a very bright future. A few thoughts on each.
During the past year, the NAPPF Board has been very busy restructuring the
NAPPF to be a Pilots organization. To that end, NAPPF has contributed to
industry committees and the Board has voted on and implemented a number of
motions:
| The Bylaws were amended to allow
Directors to use proxy votes at Board meeting they are not able to
attend. This action has increased the participation of all Board members
on key issues. |
| The Bylaws were amended removing
non-elected members from the Board of Directors. All Board members are now
directly responsible to the membership through the election process. |
| The members of the Executive Board
(President, Vice President, Secretary & Treasurer) were elected by the
full Board. |
| Elections were held for twelve Regional
& At Large Directors. This was the largest NAPPF election to date with
the largest number of candidates running in each region. |
| NAPPF was a sponsor of the World Powered
Parachute Championship in Greenville, Illinois. |
| NAPPF presented training seminars
covering ten topics at the World Powered Parachute Championship. Members
who attended eight hours of instruction were given credit for a BFI
Refresher. |
| NAPPF was represented at the ASTM
Consensus Standard meetings. The PPC Consensus Standard will set the
minimum standards for PPCs manufactured as Light Sport Aircraft. |
| NAPPF was represented in meetings with
the FAA for the development of Practical Test Standards (PTS) for the PPC
Light Sport Pilot (LSP). The PTS is the guideline that will be used by
Designated Pilot Examiners (DPE) in testing PPC pilots for a Light Sport
Pilot Certificate. |
With all the positive
work, there was a negative. In September, ASC notified NAPPF that ASC was
canceling the contract that defined the relationship between the two
organizations. Sixty days after the notice, ASC separated NAPPF as a wing
of ASC.
NAPPF has always been an independent organization with an elected, volunteer
Board of Regional Directors and Executive Officers. NAPPF no longer has any
affiliation with ASC and is investigating an affiliation/association with
other aviation organizations interested in powered parachutes and powered
parachute pilots.
Items that the NAPPF Board is currently working on include:
| A new Training Exemption. With the
separation of NAPPF and ASC, the Board is looking into other Training
Exemptions that may be available to NAPPF members. |
| A new logo. NAPPF has used the current
logo since 1998. In 2001 Suzie Harmening, the creator of the logo, filed a
copyright on the logo. In August, 2002, she notified the NAPPF board that
the use of the logo was no longer authorized. The search is on for a new
logo. |
| Membership Benefits. A committee chaired
by Scott Hughes is looking into benefits NAPPF can offer its members. A
number of suggestions have been received and the committee is evaluating
all of them. |
| Sport Pilot. NAPPF continues to be
involved in the Light Sport Pilot/Light Sport Aircraft committees. The
objective is to represent the pilot members in these important meetings. |
| Organization. The Board is working on
creating the administrative infrastructure necessary to operate on a day
to day basis. A process for new memberships, renewals and other house
keeping functions is being set up. |
| Membership. Until the administrative
structure is completed, NAPPF members of record as of September 2002 will
continue to be NAPPF members. New members can join at any time.
Information on how to become a member of NAPPF can be found at the
website,
www.nappf.com under Membership. |
| Website. The NAPPF website continues to
be updated with information of interest to PPC pilots and information on
NAPPF workings. Check it out at
www.nappf.com. |
The future for the NAPPF
as an independent organization is exciting. Members tell the board that the
most important element is the pilot’s point of view. The mission of NAPPF
is to represent the pilot’s.
Beyond Sport Pilot, the powered parachute can operate in a number of areas
defined by the regulations. FAR Part 103 has a lot of life remaining it for
single seat PPCs. For heavier machines, the powered parachute will be in a
Category of its own. The Category status allows for the possibility of
advanced pilot privileges beyond Light Sport Pilot. Private Pilot PPC,
allowing night operations and Commercial Pilot PPC, allowing commercial
operations are possibilities. A strong pilot’s organization focused on the
future of powered parachute is what is required to start the process. NAPPF
has a goal to be that strong pilot organization.
2/2/03
The separation between NAPPF and ASC has been completed. NAPPF is an
independent aviation organization devoted executively to Powered Parachutes.
The Board is working on replacing the ASC Training Exemption for NAPPF
members and creating the infrastructure necessary to conduct daily
business.
NAPPF members prior to the NAPPF/ASC separation will continue as NAPPF
members till the Board is ready to take new/renewal memberships. Membership
dues sent to ASC does not renew NAPPF membership.
The NAPPF Board appreciates the continued support of the membership during
the transition. Thank you
2/1/03
New Regional Director in the North East
In November, Barry Shellington resigned as the North East Regional
Director. The Board thanks Barry for his hard work & contributions to NAPPF
and wish him safe flying.
The President nominated and the Board voted Ray Pickens to fill the
remaining term as North East Regional Director. Please join the Board in
welcoming Ray.
1/29/03
ASTM Meeting Lakeland
NAPPF participate in the ASTM meetings held in Lakeland, Fl. Meeting topics &
work focused on the 5 documents for Powered Parachutes. The documents include:
F37.30 DP
Standard Specification for Design and Performance Requirements for Powered
Parachute
F37.31 QA
Standard Specification for a Manufacturer Quality Assurance Program for Powered
Parachute Aircraft
F37.32 CA
Standard Specification for a Continued Airworthiness System for Powered
Parachute Aircraft
F37.33 RPI
Standard Specification for Required Product Information to be provided with
Powered Parachute Aircraft.
F37.34 PAT
Standard Specification for a Production Acceptance Testing System for Powered
Parachute Aircraft
A large portion of the work was completed via on going conference calls prior to
the Lakeland meeting. The conference call strategy will continue during the
year.
The NAPPF representative was Jim Sweeney.
12/24/02
The Board of NAPPF has received a letter from ASC terminating NAPPF as a
wing of ASC and canceling the Service Agreement between NAPPF and ASC. The
Service Agreement defines the relationship between the two organizations.
The termination will take effect in 60 days from 9/25/02 unless NAPPF agrees
to an earlier termination.
The NAPPF Board of Directors is reviewing the termination letter to
understand the rational on the part of ASC and the options available to
NAPPF. As part of the review, the NAPPF Board is establishing committees to
look into NAPPF incorporation and Member Benefits.
NAPPF members can contact any of the NAPPF Board Members, contact
information at
Board Members, or
info@nappf.com for more information as it becomes available.
The goal of NAPPF, as a pilot membership organization, is to continue to
support PPC pilots.
8/22/02
Pictures from the NAPPF sponsored World Powered Parachute Championships,
Greenville, IL, can be found at
http://www.nappf.net/gallery/albums.php
8/22/02
NAPPF presented a number of seminars at the World Powered Parachute
Championships, in Greenville, IL. The objective of the seminars is “Safety
through Education and Training”.
The topics presented, presenter and the attendance at each seminar is listed
below.
Topic
Presenter Organization Attendees
Airspace & Sectional Charts Jim Sweeney NAPPF
19
Sport Pilot Update Ron Wagner
NAPPF 14
Log Book Endorsements CX
Weather X
Part 103 & Exemption Jim Sweeney
NAPPF 7
Responsibilities of BFI/AFI CX
Weather X
Training Techniques A Frederick Scheffel NAPPF
12
Training Techniques B Frederick
Scheffel NAPPF 8
Canopy Stuff Scott Hughes
NAPPF 22
Weather, NOTAMS & TFR Jim Sweeney
NAPPF 9
Rotax Engine MX & Repair Tom Olenik Olenik
Aviation Lots (no attendance taken)
NAPPF sponsored the Briefing/Seminar tent and
the 2nd seminar tent. The seminars were open to all who attended
the Championships.
8/22/02
The results of the NAPPF Regional Director Election are in. The winners
are posted for the Region they will represent. The newly elected Regional
Directors will serve a 3 year term. Please give them your support and feel
free to contact them with questions, comments or suggestions on NAPPF. A
full list of NAPPF Regional Directors can be found at
Board Members
Election Results for NAPPF Regional Directors
Northwestern Region ‑ includes the states of Washington, Oregon,
Montana, Idaho, Wyoming and Alaska.
Sol Lovas
sollovas@wtp.net
Term thru Sep 2005
Southwestern Region ‑ includes the states of California, Nevada, Arizona,
Utah, Colorado and Hawaii.
Frederick Scheffel info@skytrailsranch.com
Term thru Sep 2005
North Central Region ‑ includes the states of N. Dakota, S. Dakota,
Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas and Missouri.
Ralph McClurg
mcclurg@sofnet.com
Term thru Sep 2005
Southeastern Region ‑ includes the states of Kentucky, Tennessee, N.
Carolina, S. Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Puerto Rico
and the Virgin Islands.
Jim Byers
jbyers468@aol.com
Tern thru Sep
2005
Northeastern Region ‑ includes the states of Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire,
Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland,
New York, Pennsylvania, W. Virginia, Virginia and District of Columbia.
Barry Shellington
parafly@erols.com Term
thru Sep 2005
Canada
Chris East
chriseast@shaw.ca Tern
thru Sep 2005
At‑Large
Jeff Jensen
Jeffceas@aol.com Term
thru Sep 2005
Jim Sweeney
jimsweeney@att.net Term
thru Sep 2005
Tony Irwin
anthony_irwin@yahoo.com
Term thru Sep 2005
Doug Miller DMiller779@aol.com
Term thru Sep 2005
8/9/02
Chute-Out on the Prairie Aug 15 - 18
www.chute-out.com
Hi Everybody, Plans are shaping up well for the 3rd Annual World Powered
Parachute Championship. In fact there is one area that has surpassed
expectations already. That area is the support that we are getting from
powered parachute manufacturers and vendors.
In fact I am proud to say that we have more powered parachute manufacturers
being represented at the World Championship than ever before. This is great
news because it shows that a powered parachute focused event can work on a
big scale.
Of course this is also great news for anyone shopping for a powered
parachute! Here is the last place this summer to be able to compare
machines feature to feature and price to price. Not only that, this is the
ONLY place were you can see so many models of machines competing
head-to-head in an area that really counts, flying!
Another first is that we will also have on site two Trike manufacturer
Representatives. Pegasus and Airborne. If you want to look at something on
more of the faster side, here is your chance.
We'll also have the big three organizations that support our world. The
NAPPF is the big sponsor of things going on and is managing the Forum
program. Jim Sweeney is going to be doing a whole lot of talking. We are
working up a program of talks that if you attend each one you are able to
get your refresher training.
I'm still hoping Tom Olenik is able to break away from his shop to come out
and do an engine seminar. Scott Hughes is going to do a talk on parachutes.
We will also have Frederick Scheffel and George Begue' on the grounds and we
may shame them into speaking.
The other main players in the Organizational Mix are ASC and EAA. If you
have questions about Sport Pilot, the folks to talk to will be on site!
And did I mention other vendors like Bear Perkins, Jeff Jensen's 'Cutting
Edge Airsports', and ZDE engines, and Lighthouse T-Shirts and Yukon Delta?
How about the live bands? I'm sure you've heard about monster truck rides.
(Folks doing that will be sitting up higher than a lot of us fly!)
Of course UltraFlight Magazine will be on site promoting the industry to
newcomers with thousands of free magazines (the skid came in yesterday!)
We are going to have a great time! But if you are in the market to buy a
new powered parachute or accessories this is the place to be August 15-18!
Now for the record setting list of powered parachuting manufacturers!
Powrachute
Blue Herron
SkyMaster
Buckeye
Gemini
Eagle's Wing
Phoenix
Aerochute International (the Aussies)
Paraski
And the way things are going, more companies may be showing up yet!
Hope to see you here in Greenville!
Roy
NAPPF is a sponsor of Chute-Out on the Prairie. Chute-Out on the Prairie is
the NAPPF National Competition for 2002.
8/9/02
AOPA ePILOT
Volume 4, Issue 32 • August 9, 2002
www.aopa.org
SENATE COMMITTEE CALLS FOR GRAPHICAL NOTAMS
The push
toward providing pilots with graphical notams got much-needed help from the
Senate Appropriations Committee in its version of the FAA funding bill for
fiscal year 2003. The committee directs the FAA to provide pilots with
graphical notams including those establishing temporary flight restriction (TFR)
airspace. The committee goes on to say that it believes the graphics can be
conveyed through DUAT and other sources, including the Internet. "Since
September 11 there has been a proliferation of security TFRs that affect
pilots nationwide," said Andrew Cebula, AOPA senior vice president of
Government and Technical Affairs. "The FAA's increased use of TFRs has
resulted in a need to change the way this information is conveyed to pilots,
and graphical depiction of restricted airspace is a necessity." The FAA is
currently developing a graphical notam product for its FSS briefers, but
this congressional directive would require that the graphical notams also be
provided to pilots.
7/31/02
Aero-News Network "Propwash" E-Mail Aero-News Summary
www.aero-news.net
PPC Championships Coming Up (at 25 mph!)
Just Two Weeks To Go
Take a trip to southern Illinois for the most fun and challenging event in
the sport of powered parachuting: the World Powered Parachute Championship
is designed to provide great powered parachutists a venue in which to
compete for honors in flight skills. With a great combination of prizes and
challenging tasks, the pilot that wins in this competition will have
bragging rights as the best in the sport. The Chute-Out on the Prairie
offers larger prizes than any other competition in the ultralight world.
Powered Parachutes are one of the fastest-growing segments in aviation, for
two reasons: they're easy to fly, and safe. Three reasons: and they're fun.
OK -- four reasons: the view is unparalleled. Additional reasons aside,
these go-karts under canopy have some interesting flying traits. For
instance, they all go pretty much just one speed, and it's usualy about 25
mph. Push in more throttle, and you'll go higher -- at 25 mph. Pull the
throttle, and you'll descend -- at 25 mph. Trim for pitch just right, and
you'll maintain altitude -- at 25 mph.
Run out of gas, and you'll land -- at 25 mph. This quality has a lot of
advantages for a lot of people, especially those who are up there to have a
good sightseeing tour. Professional photographers are joining the ranks, as
well.
The PPC is a great way to introduce non-flying friends to aviation: it's as
safe as a parachute (obviously), and more-maneuverable. The wind blast from
the open-cockpit experience isn't annoying (they're all pushers; and they go
-- 25 mph). Conversation is possible in flight.
Besides that, these fun contraptions just beg onlookers to join the ranks of
student pilots. With decent instruction and cooperative weather, literally
hundreds have soloed in a single day.
The Chute-Out on the Prairie also offers spectators a Festival in
conjunction with the four days of competition. There will be fun for all of
the attendees at the Competition. There will be displays, manufacturer
demonstrations, food and more for guests to enjoy.
The WPPCC is a great time whether you are a long time powered parachute fan,
someone interested in the sport or if you are just looking for a fun event
to visit for an afternoon.
FMI:
http://www.chute-out.com
For the WHOLE story, go to
http://www.aero-news.net/news/sport.cfm?ContentBlockID=4969
7/19/02
AOPA ePilot
Volume 4, Issue 29 • July 19, 2002
www.aopa.org
AOPA PETITIONS FOR DRIVER'S LICENSE IN PLACE OF MEDICAL
AOPA has petitioned the FAA to allow pilots to use a driver's license as a
medical certificate, provided those pilots limit themselves to recreational
pilot privileges. Recreational pilots can fly Normal-category, fixed-gear
aircraft of up to 180 hp with no more than four seats in VFR day conditions,
and may carry only one passenger. "The FAA itself argues in its Sport Pilot
proposal that a driver's license, which allows men and women to drive an
automobile at high speeds just inches from other automobiles, provides an
equivalent level of safety for recreational purposes," said AOPA President
Phil Boyer. "And AOPA's own analysis of GA accidents over the past 20 years
supports that contention." See
AOPA Online.
For more information on TFR see -
NOTAM
SPORTING EVENT NOTAM UNCLEAR, AOPA TELLS FEDS
In letters to both the FAA and the Transportation Security Administration
(TSA), AOPA President Phil Boyer said that the current "blanket notam" for
sporting events and open-air assemblies is difficult, if not impossible, for
both pilots and the FAA to understand and follow. "While it is preferable
that the notam be withdrawn, if the concept is to be retained for some
period, it must be revised," Boyer said. See
AOPA Online.
7/18/02
Aero-News Network "Propwash" E-Mail Aero-News Summary
www.aero-news.net
AOPA says TSA's 'Blanket NOTAM' is Vague
AOPA Tells TSA and FAA 'Sporting Event NOTAM' Unclear
In letters to both the Federal Aviation Administration and the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA), AOPA President Phil Boyer said
that the current sporting event, open-air assembly "blanket NOTAM" is
difficult, if not impossible, for both pilots and the FAA to understand and
follow. "While it is preferable that the notam be withdrawn, if the concept
is to be retained for some period, it must be revised," Boyer said.
In an effort to assist the FAA in providing clear, concise information to
pilots on "major sporting events," AOPA has worked with representatives from
professional and collegiate sporting associations to develop language
revising the temporary flight restriction (TFR) NOTAM. A key component of
the proposed revisions would be that aircraft at nontowered airports would
be able to continue to operate even if the airport were located in the TFR
area. Another suggested revision would change the vague language concerning
"open-air assembly" to reflect crowd sizes of 30,000 people or more.
Just how organizers of such events would communicate their events to the
FAA; or how far in advance of the event; or how rain delays, etc., would be
handled; or the penalties organizers would face if they failed to timely
provide the required information; or which agency -- FAA or TSA, or someone
else -- would enforce the reporting, was left unmentioned.
FMI: www.faa.gov,
www.tsa.dot.gov,
www.aopa.org
For the WHOLE story, go to
http://www.aero-news.net/news/sport.cfm?ContentBlockID=4764
For more information on TFR see -
NOTAM
7/15/02
AVflash Vol. 8, Issue 29a Monday, July 15,
2002
www.avweb.com
ALPHABETS TELL FAA TO FIX CHARTS, NOTAMS:
Various alphabet groups are asking the FAA to review their TFR charting and
notification services, claiming that the lack of clear information and
non-standard standards are contributing to incursion incidents. AOPA has
offered the FAA and TSA suggested revisions including one that would allow
aircraft at non- towered airports to continue operations even if the airport
were located in areas affected by some TFRs.
The organization is also pushing for
the withdrawal of the
"blanket NOTAM" prohibiting flight over open-air assemblies of people.
EAA is concerned that "several differing standards for the identification of
Latitude and Longitude" are being used to generate definitions of TFRs.
According to EAA, the differing standards could offset restricted airspace
by up to two miles from the intended location.
7/12/02
AOPA ePilot Volume 4, Issue 28 •
July 12, 2002
www.aopa.org
FAA SENDS WARNING LETTER TO PILOTS
With the recent, highly publicized airspace violations near the White House
and Camp David fresh in the public's memory, the FAA is sending a strongly
worded letter to pilots, reminding them of the obligation to avoid temporary
flight restriction (TFR) areas. "Proper flight planning is crucial for every
flight, and pilots must familiarize themselves with all notams and TFRs
along their route of flight," says the FAA letter. AOPA had received
anecdotal evidence from members about briefers who did not have or failed to
relay the newest or most accurate information. When given a chance to
preview the letter, AOPA suggested language stressing the role of flight
service briefers in making pilots aware of restrictions. The letter includes
the Internet addresses of several sites that provide additional unofficial
information on notams and TFRs, including AOPA Online. See
AOPA Online.
...AND STARTS POSTING GRAPHICAL TFRs ON WEB SITE
The FAA has taken a step in the right direction for pilots. Recognizing the
value of showing, as well as telling, pilots where they may not fly, the FAA
is now posting graphical depictions of three of some 35 national
security-related temporary flight restriction (TFR) notams on its Web site.
"We've been pushing for this for more than two years. With the post-9/11
TFRs, this is even more critical," said Andy Cebula, AOPA senior vice
president of government and technical affairs. "We're happy to see that the
FAA finally buys in to the concept. Now they need to make graphical
depictions of all TFRs readily available to pilots and flight service
station briefers." See the
Web
site.
For more
information on TFRs see -
NOTAM
PILOTS URGED TO REMAIN VIGILANT
Although the holiday weekend passed uneventfully, security officials are
advising Americans to remain vigilant for activities that could lead to
terrorist attacks. AOPA first reported the government's concerns on July 3,
following conversations with the Transportation Security Administration.
Last Friday, the government made public the concern that terrorists might
turn to GA aircraft. While this is not a new concern, AOPA members can serve
an important role by remaining alert for suspicious activities at an airport
or in flight. Individuals observing anything suspicious should report it to
an FBI field office or local law enforcement officials. For flight schools,
flying clubs, and others renting aircraft, the FAA has a series of
suggestions that are useful for aircraft security. "Every pilot is part of a
larger aviation community, and we need to protect our airports like we watch
our own homes and neighborhoods," said Phil Boyer, AOPA president. "We ask
all our members to help the government to make sure our airports are safe."
CONGRESS TELLS TSA NOT TO SACRIFICE TRANSPORTATION
While talk in Congress continues on President Bush's plan to create a
Department of Homeland Security, one congressman in a hearing Tuesday
emphasized concerns that are key to general aviation. Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.)
directly asked Transportation Security Administration (TSA) chief John Magaw
to describe how TSA's original mission, to ensure safe and efficient
transportation systems, would not be lost if it is moved under the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge
replied that many agencies with many missions will be incorporated into
Homeland Security, and that no part of the mission will be sacrificed in the
move or synthesis into DHS. "We are continuing to work with Congress on the
transfer of TSA–it's critical that the agency doesn't lose sight of the need
for general aviation and an efficient aviation system while addressing
national security," said AOPA President Phil Boyer. "We cannot let our
transportation system become a casualty in this war."
7/8/02
Aero-News Network "Propwash" E-Mail Aero-News Summary
www.aero-news.net
GA Pilots: Secure Your Aircraft
TSA Says the Bad Guys May Try to Swipe Your Airplanes
Whether it's due to "credible indications" or just another way to prepare
the public for the abolishment of General Aviation, the Transportation
Safety Administration has ordered owners of private aircraft to take
additional measures, to be sure their aircraft are secure. Just what the
nature of the underlying threats, or the area of the country, or the type of
aircraft would be (all of which would be helpful information), the TSA
wouldn't say.
Magaw's police force said it's really a question of the nation's security
efforts' having changed the relative vulnerabilities and availabilities: now
that "Terrorists... are no longer able to hijack commercial airliners
because of increased security at commercial airports," they "may turn to GA
airports and aircraft to conduct operations." In other words, we're not any
safer; we're just in danger on more fronts; and more individual aircraft
owners must now take more precautions, and spend more money, to avoid the
problem that's been pushed "downhill" by the government and commercial
efforts at hardening the big airports. "If you observe persons, aircraft and
operations that do not fit the customary pattern at your airport, you should
immediately advise law enforcement authorities," the order said. It's never
been a bad idea, to make sure your aircraft is secure, if for no other
reason than as one more level of insurance against tampering or pilfering --
or the occasional joyride. However, the TSA says, you, as a private
aircraft owner, are now at increased danger, due to the perceived
effectiveness of efforts to make the big commercial machines safer. Unlike
the airlines, though, the Congress won't be offering you any money to
improve your security; and the TSA won't offer any additional protection.
The public is on heightened awareness of the supposed dangers of free
flights by private citizens; public opinion (outside the aviation community)
is often against any flying that's done without flight plans. The public,
recently alerted to the stupid actions of a handful of GA pilots, is ready
to support legislative and police actions against those pesky, noisy GA
airplanes, whose pilots
have nothing better to do than perform "stunts" over their homes, while
"joyriding" on Sundays. In a poll last week, taken in Virginia, half the
respondents said they'd be willing to give up rights (theirs AND yours) for
security. This might be one time when we need to beware "democracy." FMI:
www.tsa.dot.gov
7/8/02
AVflash Vol. 8, Issue 28a Monday, July 8, 2002
www.avweb.com
THE ENEMY IS US: FEDS POST GA WARNING...
The FAA, prompted by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), last
week made available on their Web site a Special Vigilance Alert calling for
immediate, specific action from the GA community. Pilots are asked to
monitor ramp areas, secure unattended aircraft and verify the identity of
personnel. Approved processes for identification seem o span from familiar
recognition to the diligent use of identification cards where they are
already in use. The TSA asks that suspicious activity, aircraft or
"operations that do not fit the customary pattern at your airport" be
immediately reported to law enforcement personnel. However you feel about
it, it seems the TSA, either through respect, logistical and financial
expedience, or another unnamed force, is largely leaving GA policing up to
the GA community.
...THE PUSH FOR BACKGROUND CHECKS...
Coincidentally, New Jersey legislators have passed to the state's governor
Senate Bill 432, which will require background checks for pilots seeking
flight training. AOPA, already doing battle locally against a similar bill
(AB 11863) proposed for New York state, says New Jersey's version would
require the checks even for pilots seeking refresher training prior to a
biennial review. The organization is rallying local pilots to contact Gov.
James McGreevey's office and urge him to veto the bill. Movement of New
York's bill seems to have stalled and AOPA is hopeful that inaction in New
York is a reaction to pilots inundating the appropriate governmental
representatives with their concerns. The group now hopes for similar or
better results across the state line.
...EDGY NEW YORKERS, LAWYERS, GA...
Two aircraft allegedly buzzed a Carnival line cruise ship, New York
beach-goers, and breached "restricted airpsace" (likely read: got too close
to a bridge) south of JFK airport on July 4 -- without operating
transponders -- according to South Florida's Sun-Sentinel. Andre Morais and
Daniel Oliveira (both of Miami), who flew a Super Cub banner-towing aircraft
and a Cessna 182, were accused Friday by the Queens County district attorney
of reckless endangerment, dangerous or reckless operation or navigation, and
violation of air traffic rules. The combination threatens them with up to
seven years in prison. The pilots landed at Monmouth Executive Airport in
New Jersey (formerly Allaire) with NYPD present -- which had chased the duo
in helicopters. Questioned and released Thursday, Friday arrest warrants
were issued for the men. Saturday they were arrested. Jim Butler of the
Florida-based Aerial Sign Co., which employs Morais and Oliveira, is waiting
hopefully for JFK's radar tapes to prove the men innocent.
7/6/02
AVflash Vol. 8, Issue 27b Thursday, July 4,
2002
www.avweb.com
WATCH THOSE TFRS ... AND WATCH YOUR TAIL...
As parades and fireworks mark today's holiday in celebration of America's
independence, general aviation pilots face continuing threats to their
freedom to fly. With Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs) blossoming like
Roman candles across the U.S., and pols and pundits decrying the terrorist
potential of GA aircraft, the GA alphabet groups are calling on pilots to
fly with extra care over the holiday weekend.
AOPA warned that the actions of a few, who have strayed into restricted
areas, are hurting the reputation of the entire industry. EAA echoed that:
"In our country's present state of awareness ... agencies responsible for
our nation's security will not tolerate continued operational errors and
indiscretions by pilots." That means stay away from landmarks, no circling
over public gatherings (including fireworks displays), and avoid those TFRs.
For more information see -
NOTAM
...AS FEARS FAIL TO ABATE...
One example of GA jitters in the mainstream media: An Associated Press story
on Tuesday quoted Paul Hudson, head honcho at the security-conscious
Aviation Consumer Action Project: "Even a small plane could carry several
hundred pounds [of explosives] and could do significant damage to a building
like the White House." And in the same story, Mary Schiavo, former
Inspector General for the DOT, offered up her legendary brand of scary
rhetoric: "We don't know as a country how to begin to address the problem of
general aviation. You're going to have to control the aircraft.
Eventually, we're going to have to require more expensive and sophisticated
equipment on the plane." Welcome to the land of the not-so-free and the
home of the controlled.
...AND INNOCENT MISTAKES CAN CARRY CONSEQUENCES
Unfortunately, pilots who stray where they have been told not to go add fuel
to the fire. Last weekend, F-16s were dispatched twice to intercept
aircraft that violated the Camp David restricted area -- once, a Beech A-23,
and another time, an ultralight. Even the Soaring Society of America warned
its members this week: "It is extremely important that all users of the
airspace respect these restrictions and understand that their mistakes not
only may result in criminal prosecution but in further restriction of access
to airspace by other responsible users." It's hard to imagine anyone being
frightened of a sailplane ... or an ultralight ... but F-16s don't joke.
Let's all be careful out there.
NOTE: How to keep track of all those Temporary Flight Restrictions?
Visit AVweb's NewsWire at <http://avweb.com/n/?27b>
for links to graphical TFRs from several sources.
For more information see -
NOTAM
7/5/02
Please take a look at the next two news items. Although they may may
not effect your state or your level of flight training directly, as the
legislation efforts continue they impact more and more levels of flight
training. Remember, operations under the 2 Seat Training Exemption are for
Training. Security is important. However we need security legislation that
has been researched to be effective for the end objective and not
legislation that is so broad that it may have a negative impact on the
aviation industry. Jim Sweeney
7/3/02
Dear EAA Member, EAA and EAA Chapter 176 (Pennington, NJ) need to
inform you that S.432 was recently passed in both NJ State houses and only
awaits the Governor's signature.
S432 requires FBI background checks on all new pilots, even people asking
for an introductory flight lesson, before they can RECEIVE ANY FLIGHT
INSTRUCTION. An FBI check now takes SIX MONTHS!! This will have a
crippling affect on the state flight schools.
EAA Chapter 176 reports that: "A flight school has to fingerprint flight
training applicants and send out to the FBI and other agencies for a
background check. You cannot undergo any training until the Dept. of
Transportation Commissioner sends the school a letter saying the check is
completed. There is no requirement that the Commissioner ever do so or do
so in a timely manner, which means that the State can deny anyone training
for any reason or for no reason. If you change schools, the fingerprinting
and commissioner's approval has to be done again. Each school has to retain
these records for an unspecified period of time. Further this legislation
as adopted may also affect current pilots. A BFR is flight training by
definition and in fact."
The bill also requires the student pilot to bear all costs associated with
the required background checks - that means they will be billed by the
local police and state police offices for fingerprinting and the
local/state background check, plus receive a bill from the FBI for the
required national background check, plus a bill from the flight school for
the administrative costs of maintaining the files. Those costs could
easily run into the thousands.
Both EAA and EAA Chapter 176 urge you to please call Governor James
McGreevey - NOW - to oppose S432 - 1-609-292-6000. Make your voice be heard
- call Governor McGreevey today - before it's too late.
If you see him out and about during the 4th of July weekend – please
personally urge him not to approve NJ Bill S432.
The text of the bill follows for your reading.
SENATE, No. 432
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
210th LEGISLATURE
PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2002 SESSION
SYNOPSIS
Requires identity check for flight instruction.
CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT
As amended by the General Assembly on June 30, 2002. (Sponsorship Updated As
Of: 7/1/2002)
An Act providing for disqualification from certain instruction, requiring
an identity background and criminal history record background check for
certain instruction and supplementing P.L.1938, c.48 (C.6:1-20 et seq.).
Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New
Jersey:
1. Any aeronautical facility, flight school or institution of higher
learning offering air or flight instruction shall require an applicant for
such instruction to provide the applicant's name, address, citizenship
status, a form of photographic identification, and such other information
as the Commissioner of Transportation, hereinafter the commissioner, may
require. Such information shall be entered upon a permanent register
maintained by the aeronautical facility, flight school or institution of
higher learning, and by the [State] Department of Transportation, which
shall be available for inspection by the commissioner, [or] and federal,
State [or] and local law enforcement officers.
2. An applicant subject to the provisions of section of this act shall
submit to being fingerprinted [on standard fingerprint cards by a municipal
law enforcement agency which cards shall be submitted to the commissioner]
in accordance with applicable State and federal laws, rules and
regulations. The applicant [also] shall provide to the commissioner written
consent to the performance of an identity background [and criminal history
record background] check. The commissioner is authorized to [exchange
fingerprint data and photographic identification with] exchange fingerprint
data and photographic identification with and request and receive
[criminal history record background] information from the Federal Bureau
of Investigation and the Division of State Police for use in performing
background checks. The division shall [inform the commissioner if an]
provide the commissioner with the results of the applicant's [criminal
history record] identity background check [reveals a conviction of a
disqualifying crime as specified in section 4 of this act]. The applicant
shall bear the cost of fingerprinting and the cost for the background
checks, including all costs of administering and processing the checks. [As
used in this act, "criminal history record background check" means a
determination of whether a person has a criminal record by
cross-referencing that person's name and fingerprints with those on file
with the Federal Bureau of Investigation[, Identification Division] and the
State Bureau of Identification in the Division of State Police.]
3. No applicant shall be permitted to receive air or flight instruction
from the aeronautical facility, flight school or institution of higher
learning [unless] until the commissioner provides written notification to
the chief administrative officer of the aeronautical facility, flight
school or institution of higher learning of the commissioner's
determination that the identity background check on the applicant [is
qualified to receive such instruction] has been completed.
4. An applicant shall be disqualified from receiving air or flight
instruction if the applicant's criminal history record background check
reveals a record of conviction of any of the following crimes:
a. In New Jersey or elsewhere any crime as follows: aggravated assault,
arson, burglary, escape, extortion, homicide, kidnapping, robbery,
aggravated sexual assault, sexual assault or endangering the welfare of a
child pursuant to N.J.S.2C:24-4, whether or not armed with or having in his
possession any weapon enumerated in subsection r. of N.J.S.2C:39-1, a crime
pursuant to the provisions of N.J.S.2C:39-3, N.J.S.2C:39-4 or N.J.S.2C:39-9,
or other than a disorderly persons or petty disorderly persons offense for
the unlawful use, possession or sale of a controlled
dangerous substance as defined in N.J.S.2C:35-2.
b. In any other state, territory, commonwealth or other jurisdiction of the
United States, or any country in the world, as a result of a conviction in a
court of competent jurisdiction, a crime which in that other jurisdiction or
country is comparable to one of the crimes enumerated in subsection a. of
this section.
4.2 The commissioner is authorized to adopt regulations, pursuant to the
"Administrative Procedure Act, " P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), to
effectuate the purposes of this act.
5.2 This act shall take effect immediately.
Sponsored by:
Senator WAYNE R. BRYANT
District 5 (Camden and Gloucester)
Senator GARRY J. FURNARI
District 36 (Bergen, Essex and Passaic)
Assemblyman NEIL M. COHEN
District 20 (Union)
Assemblyman JOHN S. WISNIEWSKI
District 19 (Middlesex)
Assemblyman PAUL SARLO
District 36 (Bergen, Essex and Passaic)
Co-Sponsored by:
Senators McNamara, Ciesla, Allen, Cardinale, Matheussen, Inverso, Sacco,
Turner, Assemblymen Blee and D'Amato
EAA and EAA Chapter 176 thank you for spending the time to read this very
important notice. WE urge you to take the time right now and immediately
call Governor McGreevey at 1-609-292-6000 and urge him not to sign NJ bill
S432.
Randy Hansen
EAA Government & Industry Relations Specialist
rhansen@eaa.org
920-426-6522
888-322-4636, extension 6522
920-426-6560 (fax)
AirVenture 2002, July 23 - 29, 2002 (http://www.airventure.org/)
EAA Wright Brothers Celebration, December 17, 2003
(http://www.countdowntokittyhawk.com/)
7/2/02
...AS SECURITY NET BROADENS
New York Wednesday joined at least five other states potentially following
Michigan's lead to require background checks for individuals seeking certain
types of flight training. Also, Isaac Richardson, director of security for
the Chicago region for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA),
offered through Friday's Herald News that small airports pose a significant
security threat and "Many of these facilities don't even have fences along
their perimeter, and that has to change." Finally, the TSA announced June
18, through Undersecretary John Magaw, that "The new focus for aviation
security encompasses components of the aviation system not previously
regulated from a security perspective, such as general aviation and
all-cargo aircraft."
7/2/02
Aero-News Network "Propwash" E-Mail Aero-News Summary
www.aero-news.net
ANN Special Report: Camp David Incursions Mean Trouble for GA
A Few GA and Ultralight Pilots Just Made Our Lives More Difficult
It was not our best weekend… with at least three confirmed intrusions
through the prohibited airspace (P-40) surrounding Camp David… and at a
time when the President was actually in residence. According to the Secret
Service, at least one aircraft got turned away with a fighter escort and
another trespass was accomplished by at least one ultralight. After
questioning, each of the pilots was released and the intrusions were ruled
"inadvertent," but each of the errant flyers are sure to face the wrath of
the FAA.
If that wasn't enough, a fourth aircraft (another ultralight) was suspected
of an additional intrusion but could not be located following the incident.
It gets worse… another "small plane" reportedly penetrated restricted
airspace around Washington by a slight margin before correcting itself (on
Sunday) and continuing onward. Government sources claim that "a couple of
dozen incidents" have transpired since much of the nation's airspace got FAR
more restrictive in the wake of the tragedies of September 11th, though they
state that a number have gone unreported and did not require the scrambling
of military escorts.
The past weekend went to hell, first, when a single aircraft violated
airspace surrounding Camp David at 0950, Saturday. This occurred just three
hours after President Bush had undergone a colonoscopy and was reportedly
getting ready to take a walk.
The FAA says the aircraft, a Beech A-23 (a Musketeer if the ID is correct),
was intercepted by F-16s at 4,500 feet about 15 miles from Frederick (MD),
and escorted to the Winchester Regional Airport (just south of Camp David)
in Virginia. After questioning, the pilot and passenger were allowed to
depart (probably looking for a change of laundry). One source indicates that
the pilot did NOT respond to radio queries and that this is the reason a
fighter escort was ordered.
Another transgression took place as a single-engine Cessna flew into P-40 on
Sunday morning. The jets took a break this time but the pilot was questioned
upon landing in Frederick. Jets were scrambled in the ultralight incident(s)
Saturday afternoon, but no aircraft were found after the arrival of the
fighters.
E-I-C Note: Folks… we are under a magnifying glass right now whether we like
it or not. While we have, undoubtedly, been treated unfairly and our rights
trampled upon a number of times, it is incidents like these that provide the
excuses needed to give our government the reason to shut our birds down.
There have been persistent rumors from a number of highly credible
Washington sources that say the Feds are waiting for just the right example
to make our lives a living hell… and it's this kind of crap that makes it
easy for them to do so. Let's be careful, attentive, and vigilant out there…
because the next transgression could result in untenable restrictions for us
all. Worse: it is a matter of time before someone gets scared and reacts
poorly when approached by a fighter escort and some poor guy gets blown all
to hell by some kid in an F-15 who will follow orders when he's told to
shoot to kill. Don't doubt that they will do it. I kid you not, folks, this
is a serious matter! FMI:
www.faa.gov
For the WHOLE story, go to
http://www.aero-news.net/news/sport.cfm?ContentBlockID=4486
7/1/02
AVflash
Vol. 8, Issue 27a Monday, July 1, 2002
www.avweb.com
EAA ISSUES PLEA...
EAA is warning that if TFR incursions continue, federal regulators are ready
to bring the hammer down. In a news release (remarkable for its scolding
tone), EAA is warning pilots to respect flight restrictions and the
common-sense advice from authorities not to circle over newly sensitive
sites like reservoirs or power plants. The association warns that the slap
on the wrist may soon be replaced with fines, jail time, certificate
revocation and maybe even aircraft seizures if the incursions don't stop.
The embarrassing incidents like the recent C-182 over the White House are
also making it tough on other GA lobbyists, who are trying to ensure that
any future security measures applied to GA are both effective and
reasonable.
For more information see -
NOTAM
7/1/02
Continued Incursions Threaten
Freedom of Flight
July 1, 2002 - Federal government officials
informed EAA's Washington, D.C., Office on Sunday that three separate
airspace incursions by general aviation and
ultralight aircraft occurred into Camp David's restricted airspace
this past weekend when the president was there. Two
of these general aviation aircraft were
ultralights. While the incursions were labeled
"accidental," their effect cannot be understated: In our country's present
state of awareness for terrorism, agencies responsible for our nation's
security will not tolerate continued operational errors and indiscretions by
pilots. At risk are the very freedoms of flight-through expanded TFR
airspace or increased penalties for violations-if incursions into sensitive
areas continue.
Since very shortly after the terrorist
attacks of September 11, EAA's website has provided its members with
full-color on-line maps and sectional charts of all current temporary flight
restrictions in the U.S.. EAA strongly urges pilots to log on, search for
active TFR areas in your flight plan, and make absolutely certain to
avoid all sensitive areas. Be fully informed before and during your flight.
Here is a link to get to the TFR mapping pages.
http://www.eaa.org/pilot_info.html
For more information see -
NOTAM
6/27/02
Analysis: TFR Incursions Doing Damage To GA
Security Negotiations
June 27, 2002 - The political fallout from the widely reported June 19
incursion into Washington, D.C., restricted airspace was compounded by two
additional technical violations of the Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR)
over the ensuing weekend by general aviation aircraft. These incursions
ignited more urgent discussions among the security, military and aviation
arms of the federal government regarding GA's impact on security in the
nation's capital and other areas protected by TFRs. EAA has been in
continual contact with the various federal agencies (TSA, FAA, U.S. Customs)
urging restraint and flexibility in dealing with GA operations and airspace
security. Unfortunately, due to the operational errors and indiscretions of
a few pilots, pressure is once again mounting for more dramatic GA security
measures
For more information see -
NOTAM
6/14/02
NAPPF National Elections
Ballots for the NAPPF National Elections are in the mail. NAPPF members will
receive a ballot for their Region and a biography for all of the candidates.
More information on the election can be found at
Annual Election and
NAPPF
UPDATE.
This is a very election - Please Vote
5/25/02
NAPPF Elections
Elections for a number of the NAPPF Regional Director positions will
be held in July. NAPPF Members will receive a Bio for each candidate and a
ballot for the region of the country that they live in. You can determine
the region with an election scheduled by viewing
Board
Members on on this website.
If you are interested in running for the NAPPF Board and live in a region
that will hold an election, please send a short Bio describing yourself and
your aviation/PPC background to the Nomination Committee by 6/1/02
NAPPF
Nomination Committee
15487 State Rt. 72
Genoa, IL 60135
Please vote
5/20/02
Regional Director - Canada
The NAPPF Board of Directors has appointed
Chris East to serve as the Regional Director for Canada for the remaining of
the open term. Chris can be contacted at chriseast@shaw.ca
5/14/02
NAPPF Board Meetings
The status of NAPPF In-Person and Internet Board Meetings
is now available at
Board Meetings on this web site
5/8/02
Comments on on Sport Pilot (Docket 11133) were sent to the FAA by Board
members Sol Lovas, Ralph McClurg, Roy Beisswenger and Jim Sweeney.
To link to all comments submitted to the FAA go to
Sport
Pilot, click on
Sport Pilot Response and follow the
linking instructions.
4/21/02
NAPPF Sun N Fun Board Meeting
An NAPPF Board Meeting was held at Sun N Fun on 4/11/02. The minutes of the
meeting are available at
Board Meetings
4/21/02
Monthly Newsletter
In addition to this website, AERO CONNECTIONS Magazine is the primary
format to get news and information to the membership of NAPPF. It serves as
our monthly newsletter. In addition to the administrative information
provided, it is also a place for commentary and articles from the
membership. If you have material for the website or for the
NAPPF
UPDATE published in AERO CONNECTIONS please sent it to
info@nappf.com
or contact any of the board members for assistance.
3/31/02
NAPPF
Board Meeting
An NAPPF Board meeting will be held
at Sun N Fun, Thursday, 4/11/02, 2:00 PM, at the ASC tent. All members are
invited to attend the board meeting. This will be an opportunity to meet
the board members who are able to attend. The board meeting at Sun N Fun is
an in person continuation of the of the ongoing internet board meeting.
3/31/02
NAPPF Members Meeting
There will a meeting for NAPPF
members at Sun N Fun, Thursday, 4/11/02, 2:30 PM, at the ASC tent. All
members and those interested in NAPPF are invited to attend. The goal of
the meeting is member interaction with the board on current topics. All
industry and NAPPF issues are valid topics. If you are able to attend Sun N
Fun, the board hopes you will take the time to attend the NAPPF Member
Meeting.
3/20/02 Election of Executive Officers
T0: NAPPF Board,
The Election of Executive officers has been completed. The results are as
follows:
Jim Sweeney President
Jeff Jensen Vice President
Doug Miller Secretary
Sol Lovas Treasurer
Respectfully submitted
Suzann Harmening
3/18/02 Public Affairs Committee
The NAPPF board has voted to create a Public Affairs Committee chaired by
Ralph McClurg. The first task of the committee will be the formation of an
NAPPF response to the Sport Pilot NPRM.
See the Next (April) issue of
NAPPF UPDATE for more details
3/18/02 Election Results
The election results for the Regional Directors Election held in
February are in. The ballots were counted by the NAPPF Secretary and the
results reported to the Board:
To the NAPPF Board
The official count for the February 2002 Election ballots are in. A total of
358 ballots were received back and counted.
East Central Region - Mike Harmening
South Central Region - Scott Hughes
At Large Representative - Roy Beisswenger
Respectfully Submitted
Suzann Harmening
Secretary/Treasurer
See the Next (April) issue of
NAPPF UPDATE for more details
2/25/02 NAPPF National Competition
The NAPPF board has voted to sanction the World Powered Parachute
Championships as the NAPPF 2002 National Competition. The competition will
be held Aug 15 -Aug 18.
See the Next (April) issue of
NAPPF UPDATE for more details
2/14/02
www.avweb.com
AVflash Vol. 8, Issue 07b Thursday, February 14, 2002
OLYMPIC AIRSPACE RESTRICTIONS: YES, THEY REALLY MEAN IT...
ay attention, pilots -- those airspace restrictions surrounding the Winter
Olympic Games in Utah may be aggravating, time-consuming, etc., but if you
try to ignore them you can expect an F-16 escort to the nearest landing
site. During the last week, at least three private jets have received that
special welcome to the Games. The 45nm radius of restricted airspace around
Salt Lake City is protected by F-16s from Hill Air Force Base. The jets are
armed with cannons and air-to-air missiles and flown by pilots prepared to
shoot down any aircraft, including passenger jets, if they appear to
threaten a terrorist attack, according to the Salt Lake Tribune.
...AND IF THERE'S SMOKE, WATCH FOR FIRE
This one would seem to be fairly self-evident, but some pilots apparently
just don't get it. It's wildfire season out West, and
general aviation pilots need to steer clear of firefighting operations.
Cliff Chetwin, of the National Park Service, told AVweb that when pilots
stray into areas protected by fire-related temporary flight restrictions
(TFRs), the risk of a midair collision means firefighting aircraft must be
grounded until the intruding aircraft leaves the area. Chetwin recommends
that pilots check for TFRs during preflight briefings and stay at least five
nautical miles away from smoke columns, regardless of whether there is a TFR
or not. Makes sense to us
2/5/02
From AVbweb
www.avweb.com
AVflash Vol. 8, Issue 06a Monday, February 4, 2002
PILOTS ADVISED TO AVOID "THREATENING" FLIGHTS: The federal Nuclear
Regulatory Commission has warned that terrorists might be planning to attack
a nuclear power plant with a hijacked airliner, so the alphabet groups are
cautioning GA pilots to fly with extra care or risk another airspace
shutdown. "Maneuvers such as low, slow overflights, circling or loitering
near facilities such as power plants, dams and water-treatment centers can
be misconstrued as a potential threat to public safety," EAA said on
Friday. AOPA also told its members, "With our nation in this heightened
state of alert, once again pilots must take care not to contribute to public
fears." Before blowing off the warnings, recall November's "no-nuke NOTAM"
that shut down more than 700 airports to GA aircraft.
2/5/02
For Sport Pilot News and Information go to
Sport
Pilot
12/24/01
From AVweb
www.avweb.com
ECBS LIFTED, SANTA CAN FLY...
We reported last Thursday that in a showing of holiday cheer, the
Department of Transportation had given Santa the green light to make
multiple touch-and-go landings across the U.S. tonight to drop off
packages for millions of girls and boys. In receiving his certificate
for travel, Santa stressed to leery FAA representatives that he
personally packed all his bags, that they have remained in his sight
since he packed them and that none of the elves asked him to carry a
package for them.
...AS ELVES RUSH TO REPLACE RUDOLPH'S INTERMITTENT TRANSPONDER
Though the DOT and FAA have approved the travel plans, the Department of
Defense will be keeping a watchful eye. Sources tell AVweb the jolly
ol' elf has been asked not to loiter over power plants, sporting events,
water sources or military bases, or act suspicious in any way. Plus, he
needs to guard 121.5 on the new handheld radio Mrs. Claus surprised him
with last year, and if an F-16 pulls abeam Donner and Blitzen, he should
make for the nearest chimney.
NOTE: For more holiday fun, and David Stewart's pilots' version of
The Night Before Christmas, please visit AVweb's NewsWire at
<http://avweb.com/n/?52a>.
|
Send mail to
info@nappf.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2001 North American Powered Parachute Federation
Last modified: 06/25/03
|
|